Comparison
شریف | Sharif vs 🐋💸 جـریان پـول
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @ecoshariff | @jaryanpool |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 3.1M | 1.5M |
| Avg views | 231,785 | 95,024 |
| Engagement rate | 7.5% | 6.1% |
| 30-day growth | +204.6% | +61.9% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2407 days | 3290 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@ecoshariff
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@jaryanpool
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.